Messy campaign against ISIL.

• Author: Kristof, Nicholas
• Position: Editorials

Byline: NICHOLAS KRISTOF

President Barack Obama's rollout of a military campaign in Syria against the Islamic State gets messier by the day.

Obama's initial framing of the campaign, as a limited effort in partnership with allies, to degrade the Islamic State, made sense, and it was encouraging that Obama dampened expectations and clearly understood how much could go wrong.

Then things went downhill. A "senior administration official,'' in a briefing posted on the White House website, explained why Saudi Arabia would be a good partner in battling the Islamic State group: "Saudi Arabia has an extensive border with Syria.''

Oh?

Actually, Saudi Arabia and Syria have no border at all. Always be skeptical when the White House goes to war with a country that it misplaces on a map.

Soon the administration, after initially avoiding the word "war,'' dropped the euphemisms. It announced from multiple podiums that what we're engaging in actually is a war after all.

The latest puzzle relates to ground troops. Obama seemed to rule them out last week, saying repeatedly that U.S. troops "will not have a combat mission.'' Then Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that, if necessary, he might recommend "the use of U.S. military ground forces.''

Uh-oh.

Mr. President, you make it so hard for those of us who are basically sympathetic to your foreign policy. All this feels chaotic, poorly informed and uncoordinated -- indeed, like a potential "slippery slope,'' as a New York Times editorial warned.

Of course, it's easy for us in the grandstands to criticize those walking the tightrope. I agree with Obama's essential plan of authorizing airstrikes in Syria, if done cautiously and in conjunction with air forces of Sunni allies. But we can't want to defeat the Islamic State more than the countries in its path, and right now we do.

U.S. involvement must be predicated on an inclusive Iraqi government so that Sunni tribes confront the Islamic State. It must entail cooperation from Turkey to disrupt Islamic State financing. It should entail a social media arm to counter Islamic State propaganda, cyberwarfare to spy on the Islamic State and disrupt it, and additional intelligence gathering to monitor foreign fighters who may return home. And Obama is right that Congress should finance and arm some Free Syrian Army commanders, as a counterweight to the Islamic State. Some fighters have joined the Islamic State simply because it offers better...