'Special' path to citizenship stalls.

Byline: Erica Werner

5The reality: It's far from clear what a path to citizenship that's not a special path to citizenship might look like, or how many people it might help.

5The GOP: Republicans say people who illegally crossed the border or overstayed their visas should not be rewarded with a special, tailor-made solution.

5The supporters: Democrats, some Republicans and most outside immigration advocates are pushing for a relatively straightforward path to citizenship like the one in the Senate.

5The agenda: Once Congress returns from its summer break the week of Sept. 9, the focus will be on the GOP-led House.

WASHINGTON -- As Congress wrestles with immigration legislation, a central question is whether the 11 million immigrants already in the United States illegally should get a path to citizenship.

The answer from a small but growing number of House Republicans is ''yes,'' just as long as it's not the ''special'' path advocated by Democrats and passed by the Senate.

''There should be a pathway to citizenship -- not a special pathway and not no pathway,'' Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told ABC 4 Utah after speaking at a recent town hall meeting in his district. ''But there has to be a legal, lawful way to go through this process that works, and right now it doesn't.''

Many House Republicans say people who illegally crossed the border or overstayed their visas should not be rewarded with a special, tailor-made solution that awards them a prize of American citizenship, especially when millions are waiting in line to attempt the process through current legal channels.

It's far from clear, however, what a path to citizenship that's not a special path to citizenship might look like, or how many people it might help.

The phrase means different things to different people, and a large number of House Republicans oppose any approach that results in citizenship for people now are in the country illegally. Some lawmakers say such immigrants should be permitted to attain legal worker status, but stop there and never progress to citizenship. That's a solution Democrats reject.

Nonetheless, advocates searching for a way ahead on one of President Barack Obama's second-term priorities see in the ''no special path to citizenship'' formulation the potential for compromise.

''I think there's a lot of space there,'' said Clarissa Martinez, director of civic engagement and immigration at the National Council of La Raza. ''And that's why I'm optimistic that...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT